THE pending bills on Magna Carta for Filipino Seafarers seek to institutionalize mechanisms to address harassment and bullying while on board the vessel.
Senator Raffy Tulfo presided over the hearing of the proposed legislation that aims to improve Filipino seafarers’ working conditions, terms of employment, and career prospects, and provide opportunities to harness their potential to the fullest.
These bills provide for the protection of the Filipino seafarers’ rights to just terms and conditions of work and a safe and secure workplace that complies with safety standards; self-organization and engagement in collective bargaining; educational advancement and training at reasonable and affordable costs; relevant information; free legal consultation; and have access to communication facilities.
Specifically, the bills mandate that seafarers shall have the right to be protected from discrimination on the basis of race, age, sex, religion, or political opinion, as well as on the basis of disablement, taking into consideration the inherent requirements of the particular undertaking.
Career opportunities shall be promoted, and appropriate working and living conditions shall be guaranteed equally among male and female seafarers.
Seafarers shall be protected against all forms of harassment and bullying while on board their ships.
Shipowners and manning agencies shall ensure protection to seafarers against harassment and bullying on board ships by establishing helplines and grievance mechanisms.
In reality, however, many seafarers are reluctant to file complaints due to the so-called “blacklisting,” a practice used to prevent certain seafarers from being employed.
Aside from Senator Tulfo , other proponents of the Magna Carta in the Senate include Senators Risa Hontiveros, Sonny Angara, Joel Villanueva, Ramon “Bong” Revilla Jr., Jinggoy Estrada, Miguel Zubiri, Win Gathcalian, Grace Poe, Loren Legarda, and Bong Go.
The first version of the proposed Magna Carta for Filipino Seafarers was the by-product of the National Seafarers Conference in 2002, which was held at the Manila Hotel and organized by the Stella Maris Philippines in coordination with the Office of Senator Ramon Magsaysay Jr.
Years later, several versions were filed by legislators that considered legal developments both locally and internationally.
These include the Maritime Labour Convention of 2006 (MLC 2006) that sets out seafarers’ rights to decent conditions of work, and embodies all up-to-date standards of existing international maritime labour conventions. MLC 2006 is also called Seafarers’ Bill of Rights and the fourth pillar of international maritime law.
The Supreme Court has also issued decisions that touched upon bullying issues.
In Career Phils. vs Godinez (G.R. No. 206826, October 2, 2017), the Court noted that a seafarer’s psychosis, severe depression or schizophrenia may be considered compensable due to the work-related stressful environment on board the vessel.
The neophyte young seafarer’s grave illness was directly caused by the unprofessional and inhumane treatment, as well as the physical, psychological, and mental abuse inflicted upon him by his superiors.
It was aggravated by their failure and refusal to provide timely medical and/or professional intervention, and their neglect and indifference to his condition even as it was deteriorating before their very eyes
Seafarers are susceptible to mental health issues due to harassment and bullying that can take a wide variety of forms, ranging from physical or verbal aggression, ill-treatment, cyber-bullying or sexual discrimination. There is even a high risk of suicide for seafarers with psychosis.
While the physical effect of harassment and bullying is fairly easy to identify on account of the obvious external signs, the same cannot be said of their emotional effects which are often denied or distorted.
In Cabuyoc vs. Inter-Orient Navigation (G.R. No. 166649, November 24, 2006), the Supreme Court ruled that the seafarer’s illness was the direct result of the demands of his shipboard employment contract and the hostile treatment and mental trauma in the hands of German ship officers. This led to his nervous breakdown and untimely repatriation to the Philippines.
The Court noted that the trauma under the POEA contract is not limited to physical in nature but may involve mental or emotional hurt, damage or loss sustained. The word “trauma” is defined as “a bodily injury caused by a physical force applied from without or a disordered psychic or behavioral state resulting from stress or injury.”
The seafarer’s disability is not only physical but mental as well because of the severe depression, mental torture, anguish, embarrassment, anger, sleepless nights, and anxiety that befell him.
(Atty. Gorecho heads the seafarers’ division of the Sapalo Velez Bundang Bulilan law offices. For comments, e-mail email@example.com, or call 0917-5025808 or 0908-8665786)